). On the other hand, it is not enough for we, front to the challenge, to describe and only to explain the especificidades and the dissonncias represented for the challenging conceptions as a reasonable reply. We have also a epistemolgico problem to be faced here. It must be examined, first, which are the instruments theoretician-metodolgicos of whom if it used for the determination of the cientificidade of History. If also we call science the addition of the available scientific knowledge in data moment, can also affirm that it has a proper content and method for establishment of the facts.
The scientific method is that it goes to determine the ways to get such knowledge, and the characteristics of this knowledge is to be true. Which the border that separates the History of science, if History has proper method, searchs the truth, not it absolute and perpetual truth, but that it can be argued? Science is the part of the knowledge that uses rational methods and that it searchs evidence experimental, looking for to see to the reality as it is. HAYDEW WRITE tells that History is a literary art of lesser value, therefore is not a science. However, LUCIEN FEBVRE and MARC BLOCH, affirm that History is a science human being who works the possible truths of another look, with proper methods and objectives, uses rational methods that search the logic to prove what it speaks. The concept that if became very used in the academy of that History is a science that studies the man and the societies human beings in the time, today already can is needing a complement or a magnifying, has seen that as many ways exist that they are used by the historians for the historical research, therefore the man are involved in some contexts of the action and the experience 3 human being.
In this way a vast possibility of the historical construction is had valuing the aspects of the studied localismo. In Whitaker (2009) it meets boarding ahead of the positioning to the inquiry method and collects of the investigated material. The author with its group of academics makes the research values ' ' Daily of Campo' ' as an efficient premise in the collection/register of a study effected on the registers of the society in the agricultural space. It speaks of the respect that all searched must have when registering the data supplied for the citizens interviewed in its study of field. It must be registered in the complete one what the informer speaks, and with respect and this respect if does not relate to the register of incorrect graphemes because the informing citizen does not emit graphs in its source of supplied information, therefore grafando the sound emitted in agreement for even speaks can is distorting the direction of a word and consequentemente compromising the direction of the supplied information. 1.3 – RURPOLIS IN OFFICIAL HISTORY. Rurpolis was small agrpolis that had as proposal to take care of to them you vary necessities appeared in the villages and agrovilas that they suggest as National Plan of Integrao (PIN) of President Mdici. The city of Rurpolis was created by the Law n 5446, of 10 of May of 1989, and installed in 01 of January of 1979, the Helium government Mota Gueiros, and desmembrado of Aveiros. It is formed by district 7: Rurpolis, its origins this tied Program of Integrao Nacional (PIN) created in 1970 for the federal, the management of Emilio Garrastazu Mdici and implanted government from 1971, to develop a great program of settling in the Amaznia, with workers without land of some points of mainly northeast Brazil, was the objective of the PIN. The axle collator of all program was the transamaznica highway, being the Marab-Altamira stretches, Altamira-Itaituba, in objective Par of special planning.